Giải chi tiết đề thi thật IELTS Writing 2024 – Từ Band 6.0 đến 8.5

TASK 1: The table shows the distance covered in various modes of transport

19852000
Walking255237
Bicycle5141
Car31994806
Local Bus429274
Long distance bus54124
Train289366
Taxi1342
Other450585
All modes47406475

Band 6.0-6.5:

The table compares the distances covered by different modes of transport in 1985 and 2000. It shows that overall, the total distance traveled by all modes increased from 4740 miles in 1985 to 6475 miles in 2000.

Cars were the most popular mode of transport in both years. In 1985, people traveled 3199 miles by car, which increased to 4806 miles in 2000. Walking and cycling saw a small decline, with walking dropping from 255 to 237 miles, and cycling from 51 to 41 miles. Local buses also saw a decrease from 429 miles to 274 miles.

On the other hand, the distance covered by long-distance buses more than doubled from 54 to 124 miles, while train journeys rose from 289 miles in 1985 to 366 miles in 2000. Taxi use also increased from 13 to 42 miles, and ‘other’ forms of transport saw a slight rise from 450 to 585 miles.

Overall, the use of cars and long-distance buses increased significantly, while there was a decrease in walking, cycling, and local bus use.


Band 7.0-7.5:

The table illustrates the distance covered by various transportation methods in 1985 and 2000. The data indicate that the total distance covered across all modes grew from 4740 miles in 1985 to 6475 miles in 2000, with the most notable increase in car use.

Cars were the dominant mode of transport in both years, with distances rising from 3199 miles in 1985 to 4806 miles in 2000. Walking and cycling both experienced minor declines, with walking dropping from 255 to 237 miles and cycling from 51 to 41 miles. Local bus travel also decreased, from 429 miles to 274 miles.

By contrast, the distance covered by long-distance buses more than doubled, rising from 54 to 124 miles, while train journeys increased from 289 miles to 366 miles. Taxi use also showed growth, from 13 to 42 miles, and other modes of transport saw a slight rise from 450 to 585 miles.

In summary, while car travel saw the most significant growth, modes such as walking, cycling, and local buses declined, indicating a shift toward more modern and efficient transportation methods.


Band 8.0-8.5:

The table provides a detailed comparison of the distances covered by different forms of transport between 1985 and 2000. Overall, there was a substantial increase in total distance covered across all transport modes, rising from 4740 miles in 1985 to 6475 miles in 2000.

The most dramatic change occurred in car use, with distances covered increasing significantly from 3199 miles in 1985 to 4806 miles in 2000, highlighting a growing reliance on personal vehicles. In contrast, walking and cycling declined, with walking falling from 255 miles to 237 miles and cycling from 51 to 41 miles, indicating reduced preference for these modes of transport.

The data also show a sharp decline in local bus usage, from 429 miles to 274 miles, while long-distance bus travel more than doubled from 54 miles to 124 miles. Train travel saw a notable increase as well, from 289 miles to 366 miles, and taxi use rose from 13 miles to 42 miles. Other forms of transport also experienced growth, from 450 miles to 585 miles.

In conclusion, while car usage surged, traditional modes such as walking, cycling, and local buses became less popular, suggesting a clear shift toward more convenient and modern transport options over the 15-year period.


Breakdown of what makes them different:

  • Vocabulary and Complexity:
    • Band 6.0-6.5 uses simpler words like “saw a decrease” and “small decline,” while the Band 7.0-7.5 and 8.0-8.5 versions use more advanced vocabulary like “experienced minor declines” or “highlighting a growing reliance.”
    • Band 8.0-8.5 also uses more precise language like “substantial increase” and “shift toward more modern and efficient transportation methods.”
  • Sentence Structure:
    • The Band 6.0-6.5 version uses basic sentence structures with fewer complex clauses, while Band 7.0-7.5 and 8.0-8.5 incorporate more complex structures and connectors to link ideas smoothly.
    • Band 8.0-8.5 has the most sophisticated structure, using passive voice and a wide variety of sentence types.
  • Data Interpretation:
    • The Band 6.0-6.5 version is more focused on simple reporting of data, while Band 7.0-7.5 adds some interpretation, such as noting changes in transportation preferences.
    • Band 8.0-8.5 gives the most analysis, interpreting the data as reflecting social trends and transport preferences over time.

Discover more from Viva English Academy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment